Re: Please wheezy-ignore #695716

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Thu, 2013-01-17 at 23:28 +0000, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> a) repackage the source (a bit messsy), upload to TPU.

I'm not sure why there'd be any repackaging needed? aiui no files have
been removed, the license information contained in them has simply been
updated.

> b) it was suggested that this could be a wheezy-ignore case. I heard
> your arguments against it and agree in principle, but one could also 
> argue that this is a little bit of an academic problem given that a free
> version of the same file is already floating around...

Have upstream stated whether the relicensing applies retrospectively, or
only to 0.6.7 and above?

Regards,

Adam