Re: Architecture qualification
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose
> > sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow.
> >
> > Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome.
> >
> I'd add a concern about the mips buildds to the arch qual page (not sure
> how to phrase it).
Assuming it's the stability issue, then maybe re-using weasel's
"unstable under load" which we used for the porter box?
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: