On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose > > > sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow. > > > > > > Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome. > > > > > I'd add a concern about the mips buildds to the arch qual page (not sure > > how to phrase it). > > Assuming it's the stability issue, then maybe re-using weasel's > "unstable under load" which we used for the porter box? > There's that, and there's some packages that can only be built on ball because lucatelli/corelli fail every time. azeem has a bunch of those. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature