Re: Comments regarding gnome-themes-standard_3.4.2-2.1_amd64.changes
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:07 AM, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 22:54 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 22:52:49 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>
>> > Le dimanche 25 novembre 2012 à 21:09 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
>> > > > Unless there's a particular reason m-a support in this package is a
>> > > > priority, I would prefer to defer that part.
>> > > >
>> > > Hrm. Seems like this has landed still with a package split in addition
>> > > to the RC bug fix. Why?
>> >
>> > The package split *is* the RC bug fix.
>> >
>> The changelog suggests the RC bug fix is splitting out accessibility
>> stuff. There seems to be another new package, with no other
>> justification than "lintian". That is the one I'm questioning.
>
> Ah sorry, I didn’t parse your sentence correctly.
>
> Indeed this split is among the “good to have” stuff but was certainly
> not worth breaking the freeze.
Actually, my intention was to do the split more completely.
So, I took the lintian warning as the indicator of my incompleteness.
And I thought there was no objection from the several reviews.
So, I still kept it.
Do you want me to undo it by another upload?
--
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
Reply to: