[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#688266: pu: package policyd-weight/0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1



Hi,

> Thanks for the quick response.  That looks better, but... :-)

You're right. Seems like I really need some more coffee :) Thank you. I've
downloaded the current source package again and added my patches from
scratch. I hope it's OK now :)

Regards,
Werner

werner@squeeze:~$ debdiff policyd-weight_0.1.15.1-2.dsc policyd-weight_0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1.dsc
diff -u policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog
--- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog
+++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+policyd-weight (0.1.15.1-2+squeeze1) squeeze; urgency=low
+
+  * Add 04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.dpatch which removes rfc-ignorant.org
+    lists due to service shut down on 2012-11-30
+  * Add 03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch which removes non-functional DNSBL
+    rbl.ipv6-world.net
+
+ -- Werner Detter <werner@aloah-from-hell.de>  Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:31:52 +0100
+
 policyd-weight (0.1.15.1-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Updating standards version to 3.8.4
diff -u policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/00list policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/00list
--- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/00list
+++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/00list
@@ -2,0 +3,2 @@
+03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch
+04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.dpatch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1.orig/debian/patches/04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.dpatch
+++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## 04_del_rfc-ignorant.org.dpatch by Werner Detter <werner@aloah-from-hell.de>
+##
+## DP: removes DNSBL dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org, abuse.rfc-ignorant.org from policyd-weight source
+
+@DPATCH@
+diff -urNad '--exclude=CVS' '--exclude=.svn' '--exclude=.git' '--exclude=.arch' '--exclude=.hg' '--exclude=_darcs' '--exclude=.bzr'
policyd-weight-0.1.15.1~/policyd-weight policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/policyd-weight
+--- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1~/policyd-weight	2008-09-24 10:59:15.000000000 +0200
++++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/policyd-weight	2012-09-20 23:45:27.998714869 +0200
+@@ -392,10 +392,7 @@
+ ## RHSBL settings
+ my @rhsbl_score = (
+     'multi.surbl.org',             4,        0,        'SURBL',
+-    'rhsbl.ahbl.org',              4,        0,        'AHBL',
+-    'dsn.rfc-ignorant.org',        3.5,      0,        'DSN_RFCI',
+-    'postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org', 0.1,      0,        'PM_RFCI',
+-    'abuse.rfc-ignorant.org',      0.1,      0,        'ABUSE_RFCI'
++    'rhsbl.ahbl.org',              4,        0,        'AHBL'
+ );
+
+ my $BL_ERROR_SKIP     = 2;  # skip a RBL if this RBL had this many continuous
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1.orig/debian/patches/03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch
+++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/debian/patches/03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
+## 03_del_non_func_ipv6_dnsbl.dpatch by Werner Detter <werner@aloah-from-hell.de>
+##
+## DP: removes non function DNSBL rbl.ipv6-world.net from policyd-weight source
+
+@DPATCH@
+diff -urNad '--exclude=CVS' '--exclude=.svn' '--exclude=.git' '--exclude=.arch' '--exclude=.hg' '--exclude=_darcs' '--exclude=.bzr'
policyd-weight-0.1.15.1~/policyd-weight policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/policyd-weight
+--- policyd-weight-0.1.15.1~/policyd-weight	2008-09-24 10:59:15.000000000 +0200
++++ policyd-weight-0.1.15.1/policyd-weight	2012-09-20 23:43:44.966720874 +0200
+@@ -375,8 +375,7 @@
+     'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org',   4.35,       -1.5,        'SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS',
+     'bl.spamcop.net',         3.75,       -1.5,        'SPAMCOP',
+     'dnsbl.njabl.org',        4.25,       -1.5,        'BL_NJABL',
+-    'ix.dnsbl.manitu.net',    4.35,          0,        'IX_MANITU',
+-    'rbl.ipv6-world.net',     4.25,          0,        'IPv6_RBL'
++    'ix.dnsbl.manitu.net',    4.35,          0,        'IX_MANITU'
+ );
+
+ my $MAXDNSBLHITS  = 2;  # If Client IP is listed in MORE


Reply to: