[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#686500: marked as done (RM: jscoverage/0.3.1-1)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:17:45 +0100
with message-id <1347427065.5105.13.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686500: RM: jscoverage/0.3.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686500,
regarding RM: jscoverage/0.3.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
686500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686500
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: Johan Euphrosine <johan@euphrosine.fr>

As recently (re)discussed with the maintainer, please, remove jscoverage
from testing (and stable), that will fix two RC-bugs (#579227 and
#684850). Quote from #579227:

Le 02/09/2012 03:48, Johan Euphrosine a écrit :
> On Sep 2, 2012 1:39 AM, "David Prévot" <taffit@debian.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:51:40PM +0100, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
>> wrote:

>>>> […] it may be a good idea to just remove
>>>> jscoverage from testing and deal with this comfortably in unstable.
>>>>
>>>> Would it make sense for you?
>>>
>>> Sure,

>> It seems jscoverage 0.3.1-1 currently in testing (and Squeeze) also
>> shipped an embedded code copy of libmozjs, so it may be sensible to
>> actually remove it from testing as suggested two years ago, and maybe
>> from Squeeze too.

> Sure, it doesn't seem upstream is actively developing it anymore.

Maybe would it make sense to request its removal from unstable too then?

Regards

David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 14:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 08:29 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> > As recently (re)discussed with the maintainer, please, remove jscoverage
> > from testing (and stable), that will fix two RC-bugs (#579227 and
> > #684850). Quote from 	#579227:
> 
> jscoverage has a reverse-build-dependency in testing - cardstories;
> that'll either need fixing or removing as well.

Having just unblocked the fix for cardstories, I've added a removal
hint.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: