Control: found -1 0.3.1-1 Hi, On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:51:40PM +0100, Johan Euphrosine wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > thank you for maintaining jscoverage. > > > > jscoverage 0.3.1-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs open > > against it. > > > > Considering that the package has a very small number of users, that > > we're supposed to release fairly soon, and that this issue looks not > > that easy to solve, it may be a good idea to just remove > > jscoverage from testing and deal with this comfortably in unstable. > > > > Would it make sense for you? > > Sure, > > The only RC bugs known to me is #579227, > > Last time I pinged upstream about it, he said that it would require a > rewrite of some key part of jscoverage in order to use the new parser > API in spidermonkey and remove the embedded copy. > > I think it is a good idea to remove jscoverage from testing if it > blocks squeeze release, and I will keep updating the unstable package > when upstream publish a new major version. It seems jscoverage 0.3.1-1 currently in testing (and Squeeze) also shipped an embedded code copy of libmozjs, so it may be sensible to actually remove it from testing as suggested two years ago, and maybe from Squeeze too. Regards David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature