Re: Bug#579227: Looks like we should drop jscoverage for squeeze

To: 579227@bugs.debian.org, David PrÃ©vot <taffit@debian.org>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#579227: Looks like we should drop jscoverage for squeeze
From: Johan Euphrosine <johan@euphrosine.fr>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 15:08:43 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAHmMxdsFP0YCfBGUDiBvpPrTYr-vohFMi0xC3CdutuHH90pDcA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAHmMxdtkt3zv1BUHwjTbm=Sj+fLiGS1fzHgdvzEMUJtgNkZ57Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101113193912.GA7472@enricozini.org> <AANLkTik7OpXf5TQJCDUtXuq_jnB0YuMnfVER7ewf1W=q@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20120901233534.GA24972@mikado.tilapin.org> <CAHmMxdtkt3zv1BUHwjTbm=Sj+fLiGS1fzHgdvzEMUJtgNkZ57Q@mail.gmail.com>

I'm not aware of any alternative for _javascript_ coverage packaged in debian. So if possible I would like to keep it in unstable.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#579227: Looks like we should drop jscoverage for squeeze
  - From: David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>