On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:47:42PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 07/31/2012 03:41 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Which is particularly important for this package because...? And using > > the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation) > > because...? > i'm definitely not going to re-iterate what all the people said about > using xz compression, feel free to watch the debconf talk and look at > the various threads on the debian mailinglists should you require more > information why and how it's beneficial to use xz in debian. To quote the manual page: | For example, decompressing a file created with xz -9 currently requires | 65 MiB of memory. I don't think that's agreed upon. If anything default options should be used. But then Julien did ask you the question why it's needed and you avoided it. That makes a useful discussion pretty hard. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature