Hi Dne Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:13:47 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> napsal(a): > On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 15:39 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > It seems that xcache 2.0.0 which is currently in testing/unstable is > > quite buggy. On Debian side, we "only" have bug#682666, > > The fix for that appears to be > http://xcache.lighttpd.net/changeset/900 , which is really small. Indeed this one is. > > but > > there seem to be more segmentation faults fixed by new upstream > > version (see changelog [1]). > > From reading through the upstream tickets and ignoring the bits that > appear to be Windows specific, it looks like the segfault fixes are > http://xcache.lighttpd.net/changeset/960 and > http://xcache.lighttpd.net/changeset/903 - is that correct? If not, > please point out what I missed. At least http://xcache.lighttpd.net/changeset/930 and http://xcache.lighttpd.net/changeset/917 which is needed for them to apply. It would be definitely possibly to work around that, but that would mean even bigger diversion from upstream code. All that summed up these are ~1k lines. Anyway if you prefer picking up patches, I've just uploaded xcache 2.0.0-2, which does that, diff is here: http://tmp.cihar.com/xcache_2.0.0-2.diff -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature