[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#680729: marked as done (unblock: google-perftools/2.0-3)



Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:57:38 +0200
with message-id <20120717175738.GB7369@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#680729: unblock: google-perftools/2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #680729,
regarding unblock: google-perftools/2.0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680729
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package google-perftools

The package in unstable fixes the following issues, which would be of use
for users and us.

  * debian/patches/20120708_ppc_ftbfs.patch: Imported Ubuntu's patch, fixing
    a build failure on powerpc, derived from the upstream:
    http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/detail?id=431
    Thanks to James Page <james.page@ubuntu.com>. (Closes: #680305)
  * debian/control: Bumped up to libunwind8-dev for Build-Depends.
    (Closes: #680724)

Regards,
Daigo

unblock google-perftools/2.0-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u google-perftools-2.0/debian/control google-perftools-2.0/debian/control
--- google-perftools-2.0/debian/control
+++ google-perftools-2.0/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 Section: libs
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Daigo Moriwaki <daigo@debian.org>
-Build-Depends: cdbs, autoconf, automake1.9, libtool, patchutils, debhelper (>= 9.0.0), binutils, libunwind7-dev [amd64]
+Build-Depends: cdbs, autoconf, automake1.9, libtool, patchutils, debhelper (>= 9.0.0), binutils, libunwind8-dev [amd64]
 Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13, automake1.4
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Homepage: http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/
diff -u google-perftools-2.0/debian/changelog google-perftools-2.0/debian/changelog
--- google-perftools-2.0/debian/changelog
+++ google-perftools-2.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+google-perftools (2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/patches/20120708_ppc_ftbfs.patch: Imported Ubuntu's patch, fixing
+    a build failure on powerpc, derived from the upstream:
+    http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/detail?id=431
+    Thanks to James Page <james.page@ubuntu.com>. (Closes: #680305)
+  * debian/control: Bumped up to libunwind8-dev for Build-Depends.
+    (Closes: #680724)
+
+ -- Daigo Moriwaki <daigo@debian.org>  Sun, 08 Jul 2012 18:08:36 +0900
+
 google-perftools (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Some include files were left out of the package.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- google-perftools-2.0.orig/debian/patches/20120708_ppc_ftbfs.patch
+++ google-perftools-2.0/debian/patches/20120708_ppc_ftbfs.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+Description: Resolve issue with FTBFS on 32bit ppc platform
+ .
+ NoBarrier versions for Atomic64 can be implemented on PPC32
+Origin: http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/detail?id=431
+
+Index: google-perftools/src/base/atomicops-internals-linuxppc.h
+===================================================================
+--- google-perftools.orig/src/base/atomicops-internals-linuxppc.h	2012-06-27 09:25:34.879532000 +0100
++++ google-perftools/src/base/atomicops-internals-linuxppc.h	2012-07-04 21:18:36.974406885 +0100
+@@ -369,14 +369,20 @@
+   return *ptr;
+ }
+ 
+-#ifdef __PPC64__
+-
+-// 64-bit Versions.
+-
++// NoBarrier versions for Atomic64 can be implemented on PPC32
+ inline void NoBarrier_Store(volatile Atomic64 *ptr, Atomic64 value) {
+   *ptr = value;
+ }
+ 
++inline Atomic64 NoBarrier_Load(volatile const Atomic64 *ptr) {
++  return *ptr;
++}
++
++
++#ifdef __PPC64__
++
++// 64-bit Versions.
++
+ inline void Acquire_Store(volatile Atomic64 *ptr, Atomic64 value) {
+   *ptr = value;
+   // This can't be _lwsync(); we need to order the immediately
+@@ -390,10 +396,6 @@
+   *ptr = value;
+ }
+ 
+-inline Atomic64 NoBarrier_Load(volatile const Atomic64 *ptr) {
+-  return *ptr;
+-}
+-
+ inline Atomic64 Acquire_Load(volatile const Atomic64 *ptr) {
+   Atomic64 value = *ptr;
+   _lwsync();

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Jul  8, 2012 at 19:50:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On 08.07.2012 10:46, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> >The package in unstable fixes the following issues, which would be
> >of use
> >for users and us.
> 
> Unfortunately, unblocking it is not possible at the moment.
> 
> >  * debian/patches/20120708_ppc_ftbfs.patch: Imported Ubuntu's
> >patch, fixing
> >    a build failure on powerpc, derived from the upstream:
> >    http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/issues/detail?id=431
> >    Thanks to James Page <james.page@ubuntu.com>. (Closes: #680305)
> 
> That's not grounds for an exception on its own, due to the fact that
> the package didn't previously build on powerpc.
> 
> >  * debian/control: Bumped up to libunwind8-dev for Build-Depends.
> >    (Closes: #680724)
> 
> libunwind8-dev isn't in wheezy, and is really unlikely to be (see
> the separate thread on your request for that).  Even with an
> unblock, the package wouldn't migrate due to the libunwind8
> dependency being unsatisfiable in testing.
> 
Therefore closing.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: