[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681910: marked as done (RM: zoph/0.8.0.1-1.1)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:43:38 +0200
with message-id <20120717174338.GA7369@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681910: RM: zoph/0.8.0.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681910,
regarding RM: zoph/0.8.0.1-1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
681910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681910
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: 678644@bugs.debian.org

Zope requires substantial changes (in a new upstream) to be fit for
release with Wheezy. There is interest in doing this, but I am suggesting 
to the release team that it will not happen in time within the criteria
for freeze exceptions, and therefore to remove it from testing. A package 
in wheezy-backports seems the most sensible way to proceed IMO.

If an exception is to be granted at a later stage then a removal now is
not a death sentence.



--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 18:09:32 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: 678644@bugs.debian.org
> 
> Zope requires substantial changes (in a new upstream) to be fit for
> release with Wheezy. There is interest in doing this, but I am
> suggesting
> to the release team that it will not happen in time within the criteria
> for freeze exceptions, and therefore to remove it from testing. A
> package
> in wheezy-backports seems the most sensible way to proceed IMO.
> 
removal hint added.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: