On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 21:18:43 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > I guess it depends on where you think the subversion package is headed. > If 1.7 will will be part of wheezy (1) not much else will need to > happen. If it will ship with 1.6, I think either the svn2cl package will > have to be removed (2) to avoid user confusion or the svn2cl component > would have to be removed from the subversion-tools package (3) in > wheezy. > > My personal preference would be 1, 3, 2 but for all of these input from > the release team is needed and at least for option 3 cooperation from > the subversion packagers is needed (Cc'd). > I'm aware of #678137 and #678559 that are svn 1.7 related and still unfixed in sid. Is there any hope of getting a fix for those soonish? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature