reflum,
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:23 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> > I want to ask if the release team decided anything in this direction.
> > Does the release team want a useful version of the package in wheezy?
> > [...]
> It's quite hard to get the "Release Team" to make an official statement in the
> timescales you're probably after, especially as you're not looking for any
> discussion.
>
> However, as Release Manager (and I have discussed this with the other RM), my
> official statement is:
>
> I have no preference either way, as long as the package complies with release
> policy, then it may be included in the release.
>
> I would suggest that solving this issue in unstable, one way or the
> other may be a better area to concentrate your efforts.
Thank you for your reply.
I'm still in my busy sommer weeks so this response is a bit late. Will
have free time again by mid of next week (including time for debian).
Your answer isn't very helpfull to me as it is. So I have some
questions:
* If I want to go for keeping it in debian (what I of cause prefer
and will do my very best) will you 0) allow uploads while in
freeze for packages readding RoarAudio support, 1) will you
suggest to do this to people who removed it because of Ron?
(Statement on this ML will of cause do, just something I can
link).
* If your answer to one of the above question is 'no' I don't feel
like spending time on this will help anybody. I suggested to
file RMs but you asked to keep them. Shell I just orphan them
instead?
Please do not get me wrong: I'm very interested in maintainig the
packages and ensure they are in a good shape, but I'm not interested in
maintaining perfectly useless packages.
Solving this in unstable isn't an option for me because this makes
renders it unuseable for people using stable (people are already asking
me what happend).
I thank you for your answer.
PS: Please keep Patrick in Cc.
--
Philipp.
(Rah of PH2)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part