Re: Architecture qualification
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:45 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > I'd add a concern about the mips buildds to the arch qual page (not sure
> > > how to phrase it).
> >
> > Assuming it's the stability issue, then maybe re-using weasel's
> > "unstable under load" which we used for the porter box?
> >
> There's that, and there's some packages that can only be built on ball
> because lucatelli/corelli fail every time. azeem has a bunch of those.
Hmmm, ball's lower spec than the octerons iirc?
Maybe "some unstable under load and unable to build all packages"?
That's a tad long-winded, but I don't have a better suggestion right
now. :-/
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: