On 15/05/12 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:51 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:On 15/05/12 21:41, Adam D. Barratt wrote:On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 21:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:On 15/05/12 17:18, Adam D. Barratt wrote:http://release.debian.org/wheezy/arch_qualify.htmlShould we add a row labeled "auto-signing" there? auto-signing makes things less a PITA and make transitions run (a bit) faster. It'd be very nice if we could require auto-signing for release architectures. It has been done for security already.Well, given how close we (hopefully) are to the freeze, we'd mostly be talking about supporting the architecture in stable, where transitions are obviously not an issue.It helps to prepare the release though. and I was told it was appreciated when point releases are in preparation ;)The bit you didn't quote also pointed out that it's not something the porters can generally do anything about, so isn't really relevant for the purposes of a mail sent _to porters_, which is what the current thread was primarily about.
FWIW, I wasn't proposing to ask porters about that, but just discuss the idea as it has already been mentioned several times. Maybe I should have started another thread. Thanks for your answers! -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/