On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:41:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > It might be worth considering as a criterion for wheezy+1, I'm not sure > it's beneficial to enforce it as a blocker for wheezy. In any case, > it's not really something that the porters can comment on / change, > unless they also happen to be buildd admins or wb-team. I think for wheezy+1 it should be implied by the criterion DSA'ed buildds. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature