[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: versioned tiff uploaded to experimental

Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:56:58 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> Do I have to do anything to ask for all tiff reverse dependencies to be
>> automatically rebuild (other than mentioning it here)?  I expect the
>> uploads within half an hour.
> I'll take care of this once the new version is in testing.  I set up
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libtiff4-symbols.html so we
> can track what's left.

Great, thanks.

> BTW, in version number comparisons '>' confusingly means greater or
> equal (and is deprecated for that reason), so I suspect the shlibs
> should really say >= 3.9.5-3 or >= 3.9.6 to also account for the
> 3.9.5-2+b2 binary NMU on armhf.  Doesn't matter much anyway, 3.9.5-2
> is greater than the stable version, just thought I'd mention it.

Oops, yeah, I knew that at one time and had forgotten.  I made the same
mistake in the control file, but lintian caught it.  I updated my notes
for shlibs files to remind myself for the future.

Jay Berkenbilt <qjb@debian.org>

Reply to: