Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 30/01/12 19:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
>> On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan
>>>> Julien Cristau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>>> Please don't change the -dev package name.
>>>> All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends
>>>> on libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with
>>>> libconfig-dev or at least libconfig9-dev?
>>> No it doesn't? You can rename the -dev package to
>>> libconfig-dev if you want, but certainly don't *need* to, and
>>> if you do it, then it would be way better from our point of
>>> view to keep building libconfig8-dev as a transitional package
>>> until the reverse deps are updated, and to do that separately
>>> from the SONAME bump.
>> If its ok, I'll leave the package as is.
I can change it if it makes it easier for you so. Your paragraph above
made it sound as if it didn't matter which way it was done.
>> To clarify, what is the process for this transition? Will the
>> package be uploaded to experimental to allow me to report bug
>> reports and patches against dependant packages?
> I'm not sure I understand what you're asking.
This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure
of what happens next. It seems common for packages to be uploaded to
experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other
maintainers update their packages accordingly. I was wondering will
this be the case with this transition?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----