Re: RFS: libconfig (requires transition)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
>> Julien Cristau <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Please don't change the -dev package name.
>> All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends on
>> libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with
>> libconfig-dev or at least libconfig9-dev?
> No it doesn't? You can rename the -dev package to libconfig-dev if
> you want, but certainly don't *need* to, and if you do it, then it
> would be way better from our point of view to keep building
> libconfig8-dev as a transitional package until the reverse deps are
> updated, and to do that separately from the SONAME bump.
If its ok, I'll leave the package as is.
To clarify, what is the process for this transition? Will the package
be uploaded to experimental to allow me to report bug reports and
patches against dependant packages?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----