On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: > On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +0000, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: > > > >> Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Please don't change the -dev package name. > >> > >> All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends on > >> libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with > >> libconfig-dev or at least libconfig9-dev? > >> > > No it doesn't? You can rename the -dev package to libconfig-dev if > > you want, but certainly don't *need* to, and if you do it, then it > > would be way better from our point of view to keep building > > libconfig8-dev as a transitional package until the reverse deps are > > updated, and to do that separately from the SONAME bump. > > If its ok, I'll leave the package as is. > Sigh. > To clarify, what is the process for this transition? Will the package > be uploaded to experimental to allow me to report bug reports and > patches against dependant packages? > I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature