Re: Plans for ITK version 4
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Steve M. Robbins <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:38:44AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
>> Thanks for all the work.
>> It would be good to have ITK4 in 'experimental'. Having coexisting
>> packages is nice to have but will cause probably too much trouble
>> (especially if we build all the language wrappers again)
> Since it's released, I was planning to upload straight to 'unstable'.
> Do you think there's a need to stage in 'experimental' first?
ITK will be build against gdcm. I would prefer to see gdcm transition
(#657288) to have ended (ie. gdcm 2.2.x into unstable) first.