Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)

To: debian-live@lists.debian.org
Cc: adam@adam-barratt.org.uk, daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net, debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
From: "Michael ." <keltoiboy@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:06:44 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAFjuqNg9WNgLXPoo9yEuyF-A=GHhGBg8k+sLasGgE4gP=zcahg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 639d37093518c47a388a8bb1bd7b6aa1@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>
References: <[🔎] 1323731252.28289.27.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 4EEA69A3.1050906@progress-technologies.net> <[🔎] 1323985858.20136.16.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 4EEA6E3A.9060403@progress-technologies.net> <[🔎] 1323987593.20136.30.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <[🔎] 4EEB03AF.1080302@progress-technologies.net> <[🔎] 639d37093518c47a388a8bb1bd7b6aa1@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org>

I'm sorry but as fascinating as this is this discussion between you two (Adam and Daniel) is it is not educational, informative or constructive and has nothing to do, now, with anything that any of us Plebian live users need to know about.

Have a great weekend

Michael

Reply to:

References:
- Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>
- Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>
- Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>
- Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#639871: gupnp transition also needs to include newer gupnp-igd
Next by Date: Re: Bug#629511: can report invalid data as valid in untaint mode
Previous by thread: Re: Planning for next squeeze point release (6.0.4)
Next by thread: Bug#651925: britney: refactor undo code into a method
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread