Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 15:41 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:12:04PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> ...
> > > cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
> >
> > The version for stable needs to be lower than the version in testing -
> > convention would be -1+squeeze1 (or -2~squeeze1 at a push).
> >
> > With that change, please go ahead; thanks.
>
> Done finally.
For the record, the package was accepted yesterday.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: