Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils
- To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Cc: Debian Release Mailing List <debian-release@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: stable-proposed-updates: considering cpufrequtils
- From: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 15:41:40 +0900
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20111203064139.GA16045@kamineko.org>
- In-reply-to: <1322320324.16684.15.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
- References: <20110918225201.GA15822@kamineko.org> <1321205590.24030.38.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <20111114215040.GB9364@kamineko.org> <1321996165.16755.3.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org> <20111123042038.GA15938@kamineko.org> <1322320324.16684.15.camel@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 03:12:04PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote:
...
> > cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
>
> The version for stable needs to be lower than the version in testing -
> convention would be -1+squeeze1 (or -2~squeeze1 at a push).
>
> With that change, please go ahead; thanks.
Done finally.
Thanks
--
mattia
:wq!
Reply to: