[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Bug#647307: haskell-xss-sanitize: fails to build on mipsel



Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2011, 17:43 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2011, 17:01 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> > On 22/11/2011 23:20, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 18.11.2011, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
> > >> I just asked to install build dependencies on eder to do tests on
> > >> mipsel.
> > > 
> > > any news from this front?
> > 
> > Yes: the package builds without errors. As usual, I don't know what to
> > do in this situation.
> 
> oh, and I think it is reasonable to upload the build (if it was built
> with -b -B), as long as it stays the exception.

by some fancy, I re-scheduled a build of xss-sanitize on mipsel and
suddently, it just built (on eysler – the build failures seem to be
buildd-specific), and all its outdated dependencies built as well:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=haskell-xss-sanitize&arch=mipsel&ver=0.3.0.1-1&stamp=1322420010

Now the haskell package are in shape for a migration:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html

@Release team: Do you think its possible to hint ghc and haskell-* into
testing soon? From the last migration it seems to be enough to hint ghc
and britney will figure out that it has to migrate haskell-* with it.
The last upload of a haskell package is haskell-maths, and needs 7 more
days to be ready to migrate.

@Debian Haskell Team: Please avoid uploading haskell libraries the next
8 days or so, or upload to experimental, unless it is a package that is
not yet in testing and not depended upon by a package that has a version
in testing.

Greetings,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: