[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#619404: v86d 0.1.10 for Squeeze?

On 09/22/2011 08:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:55 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>> On 09/22/2011 03:30 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
>>> On 09/18/2011 05:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> http://pinky.die-welt.net/~evgeni/tmp/v86d-CVE-2011-1070-stable.diff
> Please go ahead; thanks.

Just uploaded 0.1.9-1+squeeze1 (only added the + to the version-number
for nice-looking/reading ;))

>> http://pinky.die-welt.net/~evgeni/tmp/v86d-CVE-2011-1070-oldstable.diff
> Thanks; please feel free to upload that.
>> Didn't include the #525415 fix here, or would you say it's ok too?
> How confident are you that it wouldn't cause regressions on oldstable?
> Assuming we run to schedule (which hasn't happened for a while now,
> sadly), oldstable point releases only occur once every four months.

Assuming it was always built in a clean chroot it was never built with
any kernel-headers as those were not installed in the path the Makefile
was looking in. Just build-tested it in cowbuilder and seems fine.
Diff is here:

said that, i'm pretty confident that there are about zero v86d users in
oldstable (it's designed for desktops where you usually do not run
oldish releases, esp with outdated binary drivers)


Reply to: