[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#619404: v86d 0.1.10 for Squeeze?

On 09/22/2011 03:30 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Hi,
> On 09/18/2011 05:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Thanks.  As mentioned on IRC, I'd prefer a diff that didn't involve
>> moving the "now upstream" patches in to the source, and dropping the
>> patches; it makes the diff noisier and less "obvious" than would be
>> ideal for stable.
> Working on it as we write.


>> In terms of the other fixes, #525415 might be okay.
> Ok, including.
>> What's the intent
>> of
>>    * Add manual_add_modules uvesafb to the initramfs-hook (thanks
>> Ubuntu!)
> v86d needs the uvesafb module in the initrd if started there. The user
> would have to fiddle around himself with the initrd after installing
> v86d, now he hasn't as the file is added automatically.

Droped that, as it changes expected(?) behaviour in stable :)

>>> For oldstable I did not produce any debdiff, as I dont think anyone is 
>>> using v86d there, but I could apply the only-CVE patch on the package.
>> That would be good; thanks.
> Will do so.

Didn't include the #525415 fix here, or would you say it's ok too?


Reply to: