Re: v86d 0.1.10 for Squeeze?
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 16:57 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 08:26:27PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Any chance of debdiffs for stable and oldstable so we can look at
> > possibly getting this resolved in the next point release? (For which
> > the NEW queue will be frozen during the weekend of October 1st).
> For stable it would be
> (with changing the version to 0.1.10-0squeeze1?)
Thanks. As mentioned on IRC, I'd prefer a diff that didn't involve
moving the "now upstream" patches in to the source, and dropping the
patches; it makes the diff noisier and less "obvious" than would be
ideal for stable.
In terms of the other fixes, #525415 might be okay. What's the intent
* Add manual_add_modules uvesafb to the initramfs-hook (thanks
> For oldstable I did not produce any debdiff, as I dont think anyone is
> using v86d there, but I could apply the only-CVE patch on the package.
That would be good; thanks.