[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed stable update for procps

On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 20:21 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> * Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> [110803 19:50]:
> > I'd be happy with the fix for #632749, certainly.  What's the practical
> > impact of #635553?  Particularly given that it is still open in
> > unstable, I'm inclined to say we should skip it, at least for the
> > moment.
> It's probably harmless, it will just be an extra stat() that will
> always fail. If future kernel versions introduce this interface, it
> might or might not become a problem.

In that case, let's just stick with #632749 for the moment.  Please feel
free to upload that (which I assume is the update to
gnu-kbsd-version.patch + appropriate changelog stanza).



Reply to: