Re: Proposed stable update for procps

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:24 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> I'm proposing to update procps in stable to have it support kernels
> which advertise them as "3.0-something" instead of "2.6.x-something"
> or "3.0.0-something". (There are some other packages that need
> fixing, so this is a first step.)
> 
> The required patch has already landed in unstable (#632749), but another
> (maybe cosmetic) issue is still open (#635553).

Thanks for working on this.

> The debdiff would fix both things, if this is not acceptable, I can
> prepare another version only fixing #632749.

I'd be happy with the fix for #632749, certainly.  What's the practical
impact of #635553?  Particularly given that it is still open in
unstable, I'm inclined to say we should skip it, at least for the
moment.

Regards,

Adam