Re: Proposed stable update for procps
* Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> [110803 19:50]:
> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:24 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> [..]
> > The debdiff would fix both things, if this is not acceptable, I can
> > prepare another version only fixing #632749.
>
> I'd be happy with the fix for #632749, certainly. What's the practical
> impact of #635553? Particularly given that it is still open in
> unstable, I'm inclined to say we should skip it, at least for the
> moment.
It's probably harmless, it will just be an extra stat() that will
always fail. If future kernel versions introduce this interface, it
might or might not become a problem.
Christian
--
christian hofstaedtler
cellphone +43 680 2348846
Reply to: