[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed stable update for procps

* Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> [110803 19:50]:
> On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:24 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> [..] 

> > The debdiff would fix both things, if this is not acceptable, I can
> > prepare another version only fixing #632749.
> I'd be happy with the fix for #632749, certainly.  What's the practical
> impact of #635553?  Particularly given that it is still open in
> unstable, I'm inclined to say we should skip it, at least for the
> moment.

It's probably harmless, it will just be an extra stat() that will
always fail. If future kernel versions introduce this interface, it
might or might not become a problem.


christian hofstaedtler
cellphone +43 680 2348846

Reply to: