Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
> > > > Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p:
[...]
> > The kernel's now built everywhere; thanks for following up on that.  As
> > this is the first time that we've actively pushed a non-security stable
> > kernel update outside of the point release route, we'd prefer that it be
> > opened to testing from a wider selection of users than most p-u kernels
> > receive.
[...]
> I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed.

I'm assuming that's #621072, which it looks like a resolution has been
found for?

Regards,

Adam