On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e. > > > Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p: > > [...] > > > Either Dann or I will upload an update to stable-proposed-updates, > > > intended for early release through stable-updates. > > > > Unfortunately, the powerpc build reproducibly FTBFS: > > The kernel's now built everywhere; thanks for following up on that. As > this is the first time that we've actively pushed a non-security stable > kernel update outside of the point release route, we'd prefer that it be > opened to testing from a wider selection of users than most p-u kernels > receive. > > A mail to that effect will be sent to the debian-stable-announce list > shortly, with the plan being to look at pushing to stable-updates over > the weekend if no significant issues are reported beforehand. I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part