Julian Andres Klode wrote: > APT does not depend on xz. It just happens to support xz when it is > installed, it does not require it. And it always prefers other options, > unless told to do xz files Perhaps I was confused. I just didn't see it in Suggests like the other compressors. If that has nothing to do with xz-utils currently being pseudo-essential, please feel free to ignore. Sorry for the nonsense, Jonathan