Re: Openssl 1.0.0
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 23:32:17 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:30:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > We should keep both SONAMES in sid and wheezy for now, IMO. So I think
> > that means first upload openssl 1.0.0 as a new source package without
> > the -dev (this can probably happen now). Then when that's in testing
> > and you get an ack, switch the -dev from 0.9.8 to 1.0.0.
> If all you want to do is to have both libssl0.9.8 and libssl1.0.0
> both in testing at the same time, I don't see why you want to do
> it like that. I could just upload a openssl098 source package
> just containing libssl0.9.8(-dbg), and have the openssl source
> package provide libssl1.0.0 and libssl-dev. It shouldn't take
> that long for the openssl098 pacakge to migrate to testing.
Yeah I guess that would probably work too. I'd just like to avoid
anything getting blocked behind this...