[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SRM] update for network-manager in 6.0.1



Hi,

are all those patches already applied in unstable?  I do assume this now
and the ACKs are dependent on that.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:57:26AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 1/
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=9c7540deb1bd5356a12caa41dd21f898316b9a72
> 
> Ifupdown internally converts hyphens to underscores, this means it supports both
> bridge-ports and bridge_ports.
> The linked patch updates the ifupdown plugin to support both variants.
> Patch has been sent upstream and accepted.
> 
> Fixes #609831, severity important

ACK.

> 2/
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=e4568b525190677213f0a3290219145c32a6c146
> 
> The migration script did not properly quote the interface when disabling an
> entry in /etc/network/interfaces. This could lead to a broken /e/n/i file.
> Patch has been sent upstream and accepted.
> 
> Fixes #612247, severity serious

ACK.

> 3/
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=cb111f43604c48ad817c93721dc3a1d37266dbd5
> 
> This patch correctly handles device removal when properties are unreadable. This
> is a highly annoying bug when you plug/unplug network devices, as you had to
> restart network-manager without this patch. Patch is cherry-picked from upstream
> Git.
> 
> Fixes #605570, severity important.

ACK.

> 4/
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-utopia/network-manager.git;a=commitdiff;h=1760e95bcd76dafd48afe3043d64ea72f96d7a24
> Newer versions of dnsmasq validate the option parameters more strictly.
> Instead of passing a bogus file name simply use --conf-file without
> additional parameters.
> Without this patch, Ad-Hoc mode for wireless connections is broken.
> Patch is cherry-picked from upstream Git.
> 
> Fixes: #615082, severity important
> 
> Please note: The version of dnsmasq in squeeze is not affected by this
> behaviour, so this would be more of a good-to-have in case of people using
> backports of dnsmasq.

And you tested it with squeeze's dnsmasq?

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: