[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: S-P-U for #611820 ?

hi adam,

On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:17 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Ah, I failed to spot that the second diff included context from the
> > first.  Yes, if you'd prefer to include the first set of fixes then that
> > would be okay (although does make the overall diff a little noisier).
> Any news on this?

thanks for following up--got caught up in a couple things, will send
something at s-p-u this week.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: