[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

S-P-U for #611820 ?



hello -release,

quick background for those unfamiliar: dbconfig-common is a shared
framework for managing installation/upgrade/removal of databases.

recently, someone found #611820, where a bug in the sorting logic would
omit certain upgrade scripts from being processed when updating from one
version of an application to another.  this is a pretty nasty thing to
have happen, as there is no error and the admin is left to believe that
everything upgraded as expected--but likely to be left with a broken
app/database combination.

the fix is relatively small[1][2], would this be something you'd accept
to spu?


	sean

[1]
http://git.debian.org/?p=dbconfig-common/dbconfig-common.git;a=commitdiff;h=e0d8c2d7c9aff51a745b4ec316d981bbc5cc98d6

[2]
http://git.debian.org/?p=dbconfig-common/dbconfig-common.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c24ab2ed7d52e446dcacb48883f583d4e788dba

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: