[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: clisp install failure is a powerpc64 only problem?

On Fri, 14, Jan, 2011 at 02:05:29PM +0100, Philipp Kern spoke thus..
> David,
> am Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 07:55:40AM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > Of course, if someone can duplicate the bug running a 32-bit kernel that
> > changes things.  I still think we probably need a powerpc64 porterbox if
> > powerpc is going to continue as a release architecture post squeeze.
> I lobbied hard to get ppc64 buildds at all.  Now we have three: porpora,
> poulenc and praetorius.  As porpora and poulenc are identical Apple XServe G5,
> and given that we still have the slow voltaire as a ppc32 around, it might make
> sense to get one of the two to be a ppc porterbox with 64bit kernel.
> I don't know if porterboxes are possible at that location, however.  Thus
> Cc'ing d-admin and the local admin.

Unlikely we can make that a publically accessible porterbox I'm afraid.
I'd have to talk to networks at the University but I'm not sure they'd
be happy with it.  I'll ask though.


Mark Hymers <mhy at debian dot org>

"But Yossarian *still* didn't understand either how Milo could buy eggs
 in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa
 for five cents."
     Catch 22, Joseph Heller

Reply to: