[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600696: marked as done (unblock: bluefish/2.0.2-1)

Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:47:46 +0100
with message-id <4D01E932.3050205@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600696: unblock: bluefish/2.0.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600696,
regarding unblock: bluefish/2.0.2-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600696: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600696
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Please unblock package bluefish

It is in unstable since 32 days now. No serious issues have been reported to Debian nor upstream. The release 2.0.2 fixed several bugs of the 2.0.1 release and there are no reverse dependencies. So nothing shall break.

unblock bluefish/2.0.2-1

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (560, 'stable'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAky9acgACgkQm0bx+wiPa4w5WQCfazJvv4amCYeMzAWwAy7xb226
0Y4AnRaavEpwZsb0+6MApCGuwdLGTy4l
=MV6A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 10/19/2010 07:16 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> tags 600696 + moreinfo thanks
> 
> On 19/10/2010 11:50, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: 
>> release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception
>> 
>> Please unblock package bluefish
>> 
>> It is in unstable since 32 days now. No serious issues have been 
>> reported to Debian nor upstream. The release 2.0.2 fixed several
>> bugs of the 2.0.1 release and there are no reverse dependencies. So
>> nothing shall break.
>> 
> 
> That's not how it works. Could you please list the critical bugs
> fixed in 2.0.2?
> 
> Besides, ignoring the .po files leaves a large diff:
> 
> 370 files changed, 4748 insertions(+), 2280 deletions(-)
> 
> I wonder how many bugs are fixed in 2.0.2. Looking at [1] seems to
> show that there are some important fixes but this doesn't justify a
> new upstream release upload in sid.
> 
> [1] http://bluefish.openoffice.nl/changelogs/ChangeLog_2_0_2
> 
> Could you please try to extract the more important bugfixes and
> propose a new diff?
> 

It doesn't seem that we're making any progress here and it seems late
for polishing.
I'm closing this bugreport. Feel free to re-open it if you have some
worthy changes that you want to get in.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: