[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Debian] Re: Please unblock vzctl



Hi Mehdi

I'm now re-requesting to unblock vzctl.

I have uploaded an updated version with a correction to the problem
you noted. This correction was not enough though. So I have applied a few
more things.

1) The init script return with error 1 when already started or already stopped.
This makes the debian postinst and prerm scripts to fail.
2) The status command fails.
3) The start-stop-daemon is called with wrong arguments.

I have applied a patch that solve these problems. They are all critical issues
as I understand it.

This is now also reported upstream to be included there.
http://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1685

vzctl (3.0.24-9) unstable; urgency=high

  * Correction of the solution of #600455 in last upload. Applied patch
    from upstream. Thanks to Kir Kolyshkin <kir@openvz.org> for fast support.
    This patch allows vzeventd to be started.
  * Addtional corrections for vzeventd init function:
    Makes sure that init script do not return error when already started.
    Make sure the mandatory status command works.
    The start-stop-daemon was called with wrong arguments. Fixed now.

 -- Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org>  Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:02:11 +0200

Thanks in advance,

// Ola

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:07:32PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Kir
> 
> When I tested this it was obvious that this did not work as well as it should.
> I have applied two more patches to make it work as it should. This problem must
> have been masked by the other problem.
> 
> A bugreport will be sent shortly.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> // Ola
> 
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:09:03PM +0400, Kir Kolyshkin wrote:
> > Mehdi,
> >
> > Thanks for reporting that! It's my bug :( and I am also unsure
> > how this went unnoticed.
> >
> > Fixed in vzctl git:
> > http://git.openvz.org/?p=vzctl;a=commit;h=3527cc269bb51d48e0f511fbf7a807ad56c223d5
> >
> > On 10/29/2010 04:16 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >> Hi Mehdi
> >>
> >> Thanks. Will upload a new corrected version now.
> >>
> >> It was tested, but for some reason I did not catch this one.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> // Ola
> >>
> >> Quoting "Mehdi Dogguy" <mehdi@dogguy.org>:
> >>> On 29/10/2010 07:19, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >>>> Hi Release team
> >>>>
> >>>> I (with help of others) have corrected a number of important bugs  
> >>>> and one
> >>>> release critial issue for the vzctl package. You can see the 
> >>>> changes below.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> There is:
> >>>
> >>> --- vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in
> >>> +++ vzctl-3.0.24/etc/init.d/initd-functions.in
> >>> @@ -85 +85,26 @@
> >>> +vzdaemon_start()
> >>> +{
> >>> +       case DISTR in
> >>>
> >>> I guess you meant "case $DISTR in"?
> >>> I do wonder if this code was tested…
> >>>
> >>> vzdaemon_stop suffers from the same typo, fwiw.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I consider all the above important for the next stable release.
> >>>> The only one that is more on a "good to have" basis is #597555 but I
> >>>> still consider that as important to avoid potential data corruption.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I consider the above as critical.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
> >>> http://dogguy.org/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
>  --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
> /  ola@inguza.com                    Annebergsslingan 37        \
> |  opal@debian.org                   654 65 KARLSTAD            |
> |  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> \  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 

-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/  ola@inguza.com                    Annebergsslingan 37        \
|  opal@debian.org                   654 65 KARLSTAD            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: