On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 19:01:48 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Julien > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 05:38:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 17:23:09 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > > Would libesmtp-dev be unblocked? The debdiff for it is big. I Cc'ed > > > the Maintainer Jeremy T. Bouse for libesmtp for comments on this, if > > > you find it reasonable to have this updated version of libesmtp in > > > squeeze. > > > > No, it's not reasonable. > > Indeed, and I now saw an earlier discussion on this, sorry about that, > for doubling this. > > But what is about: > > > Thus, else and probably way to go: Would an upload to t-p-u be > > accepted? > > The debdiff from versions in unstable is in case attached, the > changelog is: > > esmtp (1.2-5) unstable; urgency=low > > * Debconf translation: Add Danish translation by Joe Dalton > (Closes: #596613). > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.1. > * debian/copyright: Refer to Debian systems instead of Debian > GNU/Linux systems. > > -- Salvatore Bonaccorso <salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com> Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:49:52 +0200 > I'd rather see the libesmtp bump reverted, but if that doesn't happen then I guess the esmtp translation update can go in through tpu. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature