Bug#596852: possible unblock for esmtp/1.2-5 (with libesmtp6 in advance) or t-p-u upload?

To: Salvatore Bonaccorso <salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com>, 596852@bugs.debian.org
Cc: "Jeremy T. Bouse" <jbouse@debian.org>
Subject: Bug#596852: possible unblock for esmtp/1.2-5 (with libesmtp6 in advance) or t-p-u upload?
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:38:52 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100914153852.GL3141@patate.is-a-geek.org>
Reply-to: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>, 596852@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100914152309.7807.80527.reportbug@elende.valinor.li>
References: <[🔎] 20100914152309.7807.80527.reportbug@elende.valinor.li>

On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 17:23:09 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:

> Would libesmtp-dev be unblocked? The debdiff for it is big. I Cc'ed
> the Maintainer Jeremy T. Bouse for libesmtp for comments on this, if
> you find it reasonable to have this updated version of libesmtp in
> squeeze.

No, it's not reasonable.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#596852: possible unblock for esmtp/1.2-5 (with libesmtp6 in advance) or t-p-u upload?
  - From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com>

References:
- Bug#596852: possible unblock for esmtp/1.2-5 (with libesmtp6 in advance) or t-p-u upload?
  - From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <salvatore.bonaccorso@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#519006: mips/ld: non-dynamic relocations refer to dynamic symbol
Next by Date: Processed: closing 596195
Previous by thread: Bug#596852: possible unblock for esmtp/1.2-5 (with libesmtp6 in advance) or t-p-u upload?
Next by thread: Bug#596852: possible unblock for esmtp/1.2-5 (with libesmtp6 in advance) or t-p-u upload?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread