On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:38:27 +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 07:47:42PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > This bit is.. odd. Why trash the 1.1.2-1 entry, and change the date on > > 1.1.1-1? > > That was a cockup on my part due to using the wrong debian/ dir as the basis > for the new build. I have fixed that, along with reinstating the status checks > having confirmed they actually work. > > 1.1.3-2 is now in unstable and has built for everything but mips (thus-far) > > I would, once again, request that it be considered for migration. > debian/control: -Architecture: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc sh4 +Architecture: alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc sparc64 debian/ekeyd-egd-linux.init: -# Should-Start: ekeyd that's not mentioned in the changelog? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature