Hi Laszlo On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:53 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > On 08/18/2010 04:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Sounds like we should go back to 3.6.x in testing and sid. > > > > If we go that way, we will have to rebuild some packages [1] (red ones). > I think we should run forward and ship the upcoming v3.7.1 with > Squeeze. Are there plans to the 3.7.2 to be in squeeze? I ask as libdbd-sqlite3-perl with the patch (see below) uploaded to unstable would build against this version now, and depends on this version. But gregoa already asked for this in [0]. [0] http://bugs.debian.org/594056 > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 12:57 +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > This might also be the cause of failures in the test suite of > > libdbd-sqlite3-perl (#591111 [0]): > [...] > > [0] <http://bugs.debian.org/591111> > It is, at least it builds with sqlite3 version 3.6.23.1 in the same > environment. On the other hand, I have found a slowness and can > reproduce it with a test case. Contacted upstream and waiting for an > answer. Only a short note on this: Niko Tyni found a patch for this, and found it to be a test suite problem. See [1]. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591111# Bests Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature