Re: User-testing of testing?
On 08/10/2010 11:55 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> - Decide where user feedback will have to go; the obvious answer is the
>>> BTS, but we need to decide whether reuse some existing (pseudo)
>>> package or create a new one for the occasion. IMHO it should be
>>> something quite obvious for the users such as "squeeze" or
>>> "squeeze-upgrades" or something like that.
>> There is upgrade-reports just for that reason...
>
> Oh, right, I apologize for my ignorance of that package. What is the
> appropriate way to tag upgrade reports so that we can easily filter on
> lenny->squeeze upgrades or alternatively filter out past unrelated
> reports?
I guess it would be best if they get a tag lenny or get closed when they
are not about upgrades to squeeze.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: