On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > - Decide where user feedback will have to go; the obvious answer is the
> > BTS, but we need to decide whether reuse some existing (pseudo)
> > package or create a new one for the occasion. IMHO it should be
> > something quite obvious for the users such as "squeeze" or
> > "squeeze-upgrades" or something like that.
> There is upgrade-reports just for that reason...
Oh, right, I apologize for my ignorance of that package. What is the
appropriate way to tag upgrade reports so that we can easily filter on
lenny->squeeze upgrades or alternatively filter out past unrelated
reports?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature