On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 18:14:45 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:05:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 01:28:46 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > > > A new upstream release that provides versionned symbols has been released > > > (6b1) and I have prepared the Debian packages. This release has an updated > > > build system which is already a big improvement. > > > > > Please feel free to upload this to unstable so reverse dependencies can > > start picking up the versioned symbols. > > OK. Should I bump the shlibs version (to 'libjpeg62 (>=6b1)' ) so that it is > easy to check whether a package was rebuild against the new libjpeg6b1 ? > > Maybe I can bump it to something innocuous like 'libjpeg62 (>=6b)' to avoid > introducing a spurious versionned depends. > I'd say just bump it to 6b1 to avoid spurious ld.so warnings. If there's no other change than the versioning in the new libjpeg then it will go in testing in 10 days so shouldn't hold up too much stuff. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature