Re: Transition: libjpeg6b with versionned symbols
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 07:21:07PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 01:28 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:57:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 19:54:25 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, at this stage I have discussed with upstream. There is a new (non
> > > > Debian specific) tarball prepared that provides versionned symbols by
> > > > default.
> > > >
> > > > I will try to contact other libjpeg maintainers in other distributions.
> > > >
> > > Thanks a lot, Bill.
> >
> > A new upstream release that provides versionned symbols has been released
> > (6b1) and I have prepared the Debian packages. This release has an updated
> > build system which is already a big improvement.
>
> Thanks for this. I assume that the new upstream release maintains the
> libjpeg62 soname?
Yes, it is totally identical to 6b in all respect outside versionned symbols.
Cheers,
--
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
Reply to: